nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 10, v.43 14-20
温度循环载荷下BGA焊点可靠性研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

针对温度循环载荷下球栅阵列(BGA)封装结构在边角处焊点易发生疲劳损伤,导致焊点失效的问题,采用有限元分析法和Engelmaier修正的Coffin-Manson疲劳寿命模型,分析不同温度循环载荷下BGA焊点的应力应变及疲劳寿命。结果表明,芯片边角处焊点应力最大,在降温阶段等效应力达到最大值,边角处焊点比中心焊点更容易累积疲劳损伤而失效,是芯片中的危险焊点;-65~150℃温循条件比-55~125℃温循条件更严苛,危险焊点等效应力高18.30%、等效塑性应变高15.65%、寿命低39.54%。BGA封装边角焊点是温度循环下的失效敏感部位;更宽的温度循环范围会显著加剧BGA焊点的应力应变响应,导致其疲劳寿命急剧缩短。

Abstract:

To address the issue that the corner solder joints of ball grid array(BGA) package structures are prone to fatigue damage and subsequent failure under thermal cycling loads, the finite element analysis method and the Engelmaier-modified Coffin-Manson fatigue life model were employed to analyze the stress, strain, and fatigue life of BGA solder joints under different thermal cycling loads. The results show that the corner solder joints of the chip experience the maximum stress, with the equivalent stress reaching its peak during the cooling phase. Compared with the central solder joints, the corner solder joints are more susceptible to cumulative fatigue damage and failure, thus being the dangerous solder joints in the chip. The thermal cycling condition of-65 ~ 150 ℃ is more severe than that of-55 ~ 125 ℃ : under the former condition, the equivalent stress of the critical solder joints is 18.30% higher, the equivalent plastic strain is 15.65% higher, and the service life is 39.54% lower. In conclusion, the corner solder joints of BGA packages are failure-sensitive locations under thermal cycling; a wider thermal cycling range significantly intensifies the stress-strain response of BGA solder joints, leading to a sharp reduction in their fatigue life.

参考文献

[1]高超,黄春跃,梁颖,等.功率循环载荷下BGA焊点应力与应变分析[J].焊接学报, 2023 44(07):63-70+132-133.

[2]潘碑,王宏光,李宇轩,等.温度循环和随机振动载荷下堆叠封装焊点可靠性模拟研究[J].固体电子学研究与进展, 2024, 44(02):161-166.

[3]王树清,文大化.混装条件下BGA焊点空洞问题[J].电子工艺技术, 2012, 33(05):289-291.

[4]王剑峰,袁渊,朱媛,等.扇出型BGA封装的焊球疲劳寿命研究[J].电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2022,40(04):75-80.

[5]戴文勤.循环剪切载荷下BGA板级结构剪切性能的研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨理工大学, 2016.

[6]王强.微电子封装中无铅焊料SnAgCu的材料Anand本构模型参数试验测定和焊点寿命预测[D].杭州:浙江工业大学, 2007.

[7]李晓延,严永长.电子封装焊点可靠性及寿命预测方法[J].机械强度, 2005(04):470-479.

[8]江方刚. BGA封装焊点有限元仿真及疲劳寿命分析[D].济南:山东大学, 2024.

[9]张跃平. BGA封装结构温循载荷下力学响应研究[D].北京:中国运载火箭技术研究院, 2021.

[10]张浩敏,李晓倩,张旭武,等. BGA封装的焊点失效分析[J].电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2021, 39(01):32-38.

[11]虞勇坚,吕栋,邹巧云. CBGA组装焊点疲劳损伤的显微组织分析[J].电子与封装, 2020, 20(10):27-31.

[12]陈轶龙. BGA封装焊点可靠性及疲劳寿命分析[D].西安:西安电子科技大学, 2016.

[13]王树清,文大化.混装条件下BGA焊点空洞问题[J].电子工艺技术, 2012, 33(05):289-291.

[14]张莉,陈旭, NOSE H,等. Anand模型预测63Sn37Pb焊锡钎料的应力应变行为[J].机械强度, 2004(04):447-450.

[15]刘信.跌落冲击载荷下板级互连系统的可靠性研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨理工大学, 2020.

[16]翟茂欣,倪屹,时广轶,等.温度循环下双面塑封BGA焊点可靠性分析[J].电子元件与材料, 2024,43(11):1345-1351+1360.

[17]姚冲.温度循环载荷下2.5D/3D封装互连结构可靠性数值模拟[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨理工大学, 2021.

[18]邵凤山,何峥纬,刘豪,等.热循环加载下微系统封装结构有限元仿真方法研究[J].微电子学与计算机,2023, 40(11):121-127.

[19]牛佳豪.多种器件焊点形态预测及复杂组件温度循环可靠性分析[D].西安:西安电子科技大学, 2021.

[20]胡兴旺.微小互连凸点中金属间化合物脆性—韧性转变行为及其对疲劳寿命的影响[D].武汉:武汉大学,2023.

基本信息:

中图分类号:TN405

引用信息:

[1]刘信,万永康,虞勇坚.温度循环载荷下BGA焊点可靠性研究[J].环境技术,2025,43(10):14-20.

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文